Apr 14, 2026 Planning &amp; Zoning

ON THE AGENDA IS ITEM NUMBER FIVE, NO FOUR, I'M SORRY.

IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE STATE OF TEXAS OPEN MEETINGS ACT, THE COMMISSION MAY NOT COMMENT OR DELIBERATE SUCH STATEMENTS DURING THIS PERIOD, EXCEPT AS AUTHORIZED BY SECTION 5 51 0.042 TEXAS GOVERNMENT CODE.

WE HAD ZERO PEOPLE SIGN UP TO SPEAK DURING PUBLIC COMMENTS.

[ 4. Consent Agenda]

NEXT IS THE CONSENT AGENDA.

ALL MATTERS LISTED UNDER THIS ITEM ARE CONSIDERED ROUTINE BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION, AND WILL BE ENACTED BY ONE MOTION.

THERE WILL NOT BE SEPARATE DISCUSSIONS ON THESE MATTERS.

APPROVAL OF THE CONSENT AGENDA AUTHORIZES THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION TO EXECUTE ALL MATTERS NECESSARY TO IMPLEMENT EACH ITEM.

ANY ITEM MAY BE REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA FOR SEPARATE DISCUSSION AND CONSIDERATION BY ANY MEMBER OF THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION.

THE CHAIR WILL ENTERTAIN A MOTION.

I MOVE TO APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA, SUBJECT TO THE RECOMMENDATION OF STAFF.

SECOND, WE HAVE A, A MOTION AND A SECOND.

ALL IN FAVOR, RAISE YOUR RIGHT HAND.

FIVE, PUBLIC HEARING ON A REQUEST BY JOSH HOUSTON.

NEXT IS ITEM NUMBER

[5. Public Hearing on a request by Josh Yusten, Evolution Homes, for a Zoning Change from a PD-23-SF-1 zoning district to Planned Development Single Family-1 (PD-SF-1) zoning district located at 101 Waterfront Drive (Property ID 175089) – Owner(s): JRM-REI LLC (ZDC-9-2026) ]

EVOLUTION HOMES FOR ZONING CHANGE FROM A PLAN DEVELOPMENT 23 SINGLE FAMILY ONE ZONING DISTRICT TO PLAN DEVELOPMENT SINGLE FAMILY ONE ZONING DISTRICT LOCATED AT 1 0 1 WATERFRONT DRIVE, PROPERTY ID 1 7 5 0 8 9 OWNERS J-R-M-R-E-I-L-L-C-Z-D-C 9 2 0 2 6.

FLOOR IS YOURS, HONOR.

GOOD EVENING COMMISSION.

UH, ZDC DASH NINE DASH 2026.

UH, IS WATERFRONT DRIVE PD.

THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING A ZONING CHANGE FROM PD DASH 23 DASH

[00:05:01]

SF ONE TO PD DASH SF ONE LOCATED AT 1 0 1 WATERFRONT DRIVE.

THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS CURRENT, CURRENTLY HAS A PRIMARY STRUCTURE TOTALING 1792 1,792 SQUARE FEET AND AN ACCESSORY STRUCTURE OF APPROXIMATELY 340 SQUARE FEET SITUATED ON 0.26 ACRES.

BOTH STRUCTURES ARE ENCROACHING INTO THE CITY'S PROPERTY, WHICH IS, UM, LAKE WAXAHATCHEE.

THE PROPERTY OWNER PROPOSES TO REDEVELOP THE LOT WITH THE INTENT OF COMPLYING WITH PD DASH 23 DASH SF ONE.

HOWEVER, THERE ARE EXCEPTIONS REQUESTED BY THE PROPERTY OWNER TO ADDRESS THROUGH A NEW PD.

UH, THE PROPERTY OWNER PROPOSES TO DEMOLISH ALL EXISTING STRUCTURES DUE TO THE ENCROACHMENTS INTO THE CITY PROPERTY AND BUILD A NEW PRIMARY STRUCTURE OF 2,412 SQUARE FEET DURING THE APPLICATION REVIEW.

THE PROPOSED SITE PLAN IS CONSISTENT WITH THE EXISTING DEVELOPMENT.

HOWEVER, IN ORDER TO ACHIEVE THIS, THE PROPERTY OWNER SEEKS EXCEPTIONS FROM THE EXISTING PD RELATED TO LOT AREA LOT WIDTH, LOT DEATH AND SETBACKS THAT WILL BE ADDRESSED IN THIS NEW PROPOSED PD.

AND, UM, ZACH, CAN YOU JUST, OR LET'S GO THROUGH THE ELEVATIONS PLAN .

SO AS YOU CAN SEE, UM, THE PROPERTY OWNER IS PROPOSING A HUNDRED PERCENT MASONRY COMPRISED OF, UH, BRICK AND STUCCO AND, UM, COLOR PAL WARM COLOR PALETTE TO, UM, MATCH THE EXISTING DEVELOPMENT.

AND ZACH, CAN YOU PULL UP THE CHART, UM, COMPARING THE EXISTING AND PROPOSED, UM, ZONING REGULATIONS AND THE PROPERTY O OWNER IS HERE IF Y'ALL HAVE ANY QUESTIONS.

OH, SORRY, ONE MORE THING.

STAFFS AND NOW SIX, UH, PUBLIC HEARING NOTICES TO THE PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN 200 FEET OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY.

NO LETTERS WERE RECEIVED WITH, UH, IN OPPOSITION AND SUPPORT OF THE APPLICATION REQUEST.

STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL SUBJECT TO THE CONDITIONS LISTED ON THE STAFF REPORT AND STAFF AND PROPERTY OWNER ARE HERE.

IF Y'ALL HAVE ANY QUESTIONS.

DO WE KNOW HOW IT HAPPENED THAT, UM, IT, THE ORIGINAL STRUCTURES WERE BUILT ON, LIKE OUTSIDE OF THE LOT? SO, UM, SO WHEN I LOOKED UP, UH, ELLIS COUNTY, IT ONLY DATES THE PRIMARY STRUCTURE GOING BACK TO 1970 AND THE ACCESSORY STRUCTURE IN 19, IN 19 BUILT IN 1980 AND IT WAS ANNEXED IN IN 1957.

SO I BELIEVE IT PROBABLY HAPPENED AROUND THE SAME TIME.

INTERESTING.

SO IS THE PROPOSED STRUCTURE, LIKE THE SURROUNDING STRUCTURES, I MEAN, IS IT IN TERMS OF ELEVATIONS AND MATERIALS? YES.

WE HAVE ANY MORE QUESTIONS FOR STAFF? THANK YOU, ANNE.

I DO HAVE, SORRY.

NO, NO, I, I'M JUST TRYING TO FIGURE THIS OUT.

SO THE SIDE YARDS WILL ONLY BE FIVE FEET? CORRECT? WHAT, WHAT IS THE, OR WHO ARE THE PROPERTY OWNERS ON THE OTHER SIDES? LIKE ARE, SO ON THE WEST SIDE IS CITY PROPERTY.

ON THE EAST SIDE IS, IS CURRENTLY VACANT.

AND THERE'S NO ENCLOSED PARKING AREA PROPOSED, CORRECT? CORRECT.

DO YOU GUYS HAVE ANY QUESTIONS? YOU INTEND TO USE THIS AS YOUR PRIMARY RESIDENCE? IT'D BE A SECONDARY HOME FOR MY FAMILY AND I.

ACTUALLY THERE'S A, THERE, THERE'S A TWO CAR GARAGE.

YES.

THAT'S UNDERNEATH.

YEAH.

ON THE FIRST, NO, I JUST, I WANTED TO MAKE SURE BECAUSE, UM, ON THE PROPOSED IT SAYS, WELL, ON THE EXISTING IT SAYS MINIMUM OF TWO ENCLOSED PARKING SPACES, BUT THEN UNDER THE PROPOSED IT JUST SAYS MINIMUM OF TWO OFF STREET PARKING SPACES.

SO CORRECT.

WE CAN ALSO HAVE, I, I BELIEVE THAT'S WHAT'S ON THE PD STANDARDS THAT WAS, UH, SUBMITTED.

WE CAN DEFINITELY CONDITION TO ADD THAT ON THERE.

GOTCHA.

ANY MORE QUESTIONS FOR STAFF? THANK YOU.

ON, IS THE APPLICANT HERE? COULD YOU COME TO THE PODIUM AND GIVE US YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS PLEASE? MY NAME IS JACOB AND I'M THE PROPERTY OWNER.

UH, YOUR ADDRESS AND YOUR LAST NAME? ONE FOUR BELLS CHAPEL ROAD, WAXAHATCHEE, TEXAS.

JACOB JOHNSON.

ALRIGHT, THANK YOU.

JACOB.

IS THERE ANYTHING YOU WANTED TO SHARE WITH US ABOUT? NO, I BELIEVE EVERYTHING WAS SHARED.

UH, THAT TABLE LISTED OUT PRETTY WELL COMPARING THE NEW TO OLD STANDARD.

[00:10:01]

A MOTION MOVE TO RECOMMEND A APPROVAL OF ZDC NINE DASH 2026 ZONING CHANGE FROM P 23 SF ONE TO PLAN DEVELOPMENT SINGLE FAMILY ONE SUBJECT TO THE CONDITIONS OF THE STAFF REPORT AUTHORIZED THE MAYOR AND OR CITY MANAGER TO ECU EXECUTE ALL DOCUMENTS ACCORDINGLY.

ANY MORE QUESTIONS FOR THE APPLICANT? THANK YOU MR. JOHNSON.

THIS IS A PUBLIC HEARING AND WE HAD ZERO PEOPLE SIGN UP TO SPEAK ON ITEM ZDC NINE DASH 2026.

UM, WE WILL NOW CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND THE CHAIR WILL ENTERTAIN

[6. Consider approval of ZDC-9-2026]

SECOND, WE HAVE A MOTION.

AND SECOND.

ALL IN FAVOR, PLEASE RAISE YOUR RIGHT HAND.

ALL OPPOSED, SAME SIGNED.

NUMBER SEVEN, PUBLIC HEARING ON A REQUEST BY DAVID MCDILL.

NEXT IS ITEM

[7. Public Hearing on a request by David McDill, Davis & McDill for a Replat of part of Lot 2, Block 175, Town Addition, to create Lots 2R-A, 2R-B, and 2R-C, Block 175, of the Town Addition, 3 Residential Lots, being 0.679 acres, located at 305 Frieson Street (Property ID 171328, 171339, & 171340) – Owner: Scott Ronald and Kimberly R. (SUB-27-2026)]

DAVID DAVIS AND MCDILL FOR A REPL OF PART OF LOT TWO BLOCK 1 7 5 TOWN EDITION TO CREATE LOTS TWO RA TWO RB AND TWO RC BLOCK 1 75 OF THE TOWN EDITION.

THREE RESIDENTIAL LOTS BEING 0.679 ACRES LOCATED AT 3 0 5 FRITON STREET.

PROPERTY ID 1 7 1 3 2 8 1 7 1 3, 3 9 AND 1 7 1 3 4 0 OWNERS, RONALD SCOTT AND KIMBERLY SCOTT SUB DASH 27 DASH 2026.

DAVID, GOOD EVENING.

GOOD EVENING.

COMMISSIONERS.

THE APPLICANT REQUESTS TO RE UM, TO REPLANT THE SUBJECT PROPERTY INTO THREE, THREE NEW RESIDENTIAL LOTS WITHIN A A SINGLE FAMILY THREE, UM, ZONING DISTRICT.

THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS LOCATED AT 3 0 5, UM, FRIERSON STREET WITH A TOTAL OF, UM, 0.6790 ACRES.

WE DON'T NORMALLY GET RELAS BEFORE THE COMMISSION, BUT UM, WE ARE, UM, DUE TO EXISTING STRUCTURES ON THE PROPERTY THAT LIE WITHIN WHERE THE RIGHT OF WAY DEDICATION, UM, AND UTILITY EASEMENTS, UM, WOULD BE WE ARE REQUESTING A VARIANCE, OR I'M SORRY, WE ARE REQUESTING, UM, THE APPLICANT FILED A PETITION FOR HARDSHIP IN ORDER TO, UM, RELIEVE THOSE, UH, STANDARD REQUIREMENTS AS THE CURRENT LOTS ARE NOT ABLE TO MEET THOSE.

SO, UM, TWO LOTS MEET THE MINIMUM LOT SIZE REQUIREMENTS OF 10,000 SQUARE FEET FOR THE SINGLE FAMILY.

THREE ZONING DISTRICT AND INFL OVERLAY WHILE ONE LOT DOES NOT.

AT 5,972 SQUARE FEET.

UM, STAFF HAS SUGGESTED A VARIABLE RIGHT OF WAY DEDICATION UP TO FIVE FEET AWAY FROM THE EXISTING STRUCTURES ALONG FRIERSON STREET WOULD BE REQUIRED, UM, WITH FULL RIGHT OF WAY DEDICATION ALONG YOUNG STREET WHERE THE, UM, STRUCTURES ARE NOT.

UM, NO.

UM, AFTER FURTHER ASSESSMENT, WHICH THIS MAY BE A LITTLE DIFFERENT FROM THE REPORT, BUT THE FURTHER ASSESSMENT, UM, NO UTILITY EASEMENT DEDICATION WILL BE REQUIRED DUE TO STAFF'S ASSESSMENT OF WHERE THE UTILITIES ARE LOCATED.

SO, UM, THEY SHOULD BE JUST FINE.

AND, UM, STAFF HAS RECEIVED ZERO LETTERS OF SUPPORT OR APPROVAL, I MEAN, I'M SORRY, SUPPORT OR OPPOSITION FOR THE PROPOSED SUP AND STAFF HAS RECOMMENDED APPROVAL BASED ON DETAILS PROVIDED IN THE STAFF REPORT SUBJECT TO THE CONDITIONS IN THE REPORT.

DAVID.

DO WE HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR STAFF COMMISSION? IS IT TYPICAL THAT WE WOULD ALLOW TWO HOMES TO BE BUILT ON THE SAME LIKE, PIECE OF PROPERTY? SO IT'S, UM, THEY'RE SEPARATE LOTS.

UM, SO THEY CAN BE, THEY CAN BE BUILT ON SEPARATE LOTS.

JUST SAME OWNER.

TWO HOUSES BEING ON ONE PLA I DON'T KNOW HOW THAT HAPPENED, BUT WE HAD THE HOUSE BUILT IN 96 AND I, I ACTUALLY THOUGHT IT WAS SEPARATE, SO, BUT I THINK THAT'S WHAT WE'RE DOING NOW.

ANY MORE QUESTIONS FOR STAFF? THANK YOU SO MUCH.

DAVID.

IS THE APPLICANT HERE? WE'RE HERE.

RONALD, JIMMY SCOTT? YES, SIR.

WHY DON'T YOU COME UP TO THE PODIUM AND GIVE ME YOUR NAME AND YOUR ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD, PLEASE? GOOD EVENING.

GOOD EVENING.

COULD I RONALD SCOTT? YES, SIR.

AND YOUR ADDRESS? UH, 3 0 5 RYERSON STREET.

WAXAHATCHEE, TEXAS.

YES, SIR.

SO NICE TO MEET YOU.

IT WAS NICE MEETING Y'ALL.

IS THERE ANYTHING YOU WANTED TO SHARE WITH US? UH, WELL THE PROPERTY THAT WE'RE, UM, WANTING TO ADD IS WHAT YOU GOT OUTLINED AND WE JUST WANT TO DO IT TO KIND OF INCLUDE IT ALL TOGETHER.

YOU KNOW WHAT I'M SAYING? AND I DON'T, UH, I WASN'T PREPARED TO SPEAK, SO THAT'S OKAY.

THAT'S OKAY.

THAT'S HARD.

THAT'S ALL, THAT'S MY INTENTION WAS JUST KIND OF JOINTED TOGETHER, YOU KNOW? MM-HMM .

UH, NOW SOMEBODY HAD A QUESTION WHEN THEY WAS ASKING ABOUT THE

[00:15:01]

WE'RE KIND OF CUTTING THAT IN, YOU KNOW, OUTRIGHT.

YEAH, THAT MAKES SENSE.

MAKES SENSE.

YEAH.

DOES, UH, THE COMMISSION HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR THE APPLICANT? WELL, THANK YOU SO MUCH MR. SMITH.

OKAY, THANK YOU.

THIS IS A PUBLIC HEARING AND WE RECEIVE ZERO, UM, PUBLIC HEARING CARDS.

SO WE WILL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING.

THE CHAIR WILL

[8. Consider approval of SUB-27-2026]

ENTERTAIN A MOTION.

I'LL MOVE TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF SUB 27 20 26 RELA OF TOWN EDITION LOTS, TWO R DASH A TWO R DASH B TO R DASH C BLOCK 1 75, SUBJECT TO THE CONDITIONS OF THE STAFF REPORT AUTHORIZING PNZ COMMISSIONER TO SIGN THE ASSOCIATED DOCUMENTS ACCORDINGLY.

SECOND, WE HAVE A MOTION AND A SECOND.

ALL IN FAVOR? RAISE YOUR RIGHT HAND PLEASE.

NEXT IS ITEM NUMBER NINE, PUBLIC HEARING ON A REQUEST BY DAVID MCDILL, DAVID DAVIS AND MCDILL, I'M READING SOMETHING WRONG, I APOLOGIZE.

NEXT IS ITEM NUMBER NINE, PUBLIC HEARING ON A REQUEST.

NO, I THINK I JUST READ THAT ONE.

I APOLOGIZE.

NEXT IS ITEM NUMBER 11, PUBLIC.

UH, COMMISSIONER, CAN I SKIP SOMETHING? YOU, YOU DO STILL NEED TO GO THROUGH AGENDA ITEM NINE.

OH, YES.

UH, THEY HAVE REQUESTED A CONTINUOUS, BUT WE SHOULD STILL GO THROUGH THIS ITEM.

THANK YOU SO MUCH, ZACH.

[9. Public Hearing on a request by Dutch Neuweiler, Minto Communities Texas, LLC, for an Amendment to Ordinance No. 3704, to revise the location of the Welcome Center and update associated Exhibits within the approved Planned Development, located at 300 Brookside Road (Property ID’s 179468, 179534, 182520, 187960, 189323, 189326, 189333, 189336, 192306, 193815, 193822, 193823, 234203, 263786, 264568, 303651, 303652) – Owners: Minto KR, LLC (ZDC-24-2026)]

PUBLIC HEARING REQUEST BY DUTCH, UH, NEW WALLER MENTO COMMUNITIES TEXAS, LLC FOR AN AMENDMENT TO ORDINANCE NUMBER 3 7 0 4.

TO REVISE THE LOCATION OF THE WELCOME CENTER AND UPDATE ASSOCIATED EXHIBITS WITHIN THE APPROVED PLAN DEVELOPMENT.

LOCATED AT 300 BROOKSIDE ROAD.

PROPERTY IDS.

THERE ARE A FEW.

1 7 9, 4, 6, 8, 1, 7, 9, 5, 3, 4, 1, 8, 2, 5, 2, 0, 1, 8, 7, 9, 6, 0, 1, 8, 9, 3, 2, 3, 1, 8, 9, 3, 2, 6, 1, 8, 9, 3, 3, 3, 1, 8, 9, 3, 3, 6, 1, 9, 2, 3, 0, 6, 1, 9, 3, 8, 1, 5, 1, 9, 3.

8, 2, 2, 1.

NINE THREE.

8 2 3 2 3, 4, 2 0 3 2 6, 3 7, 8, 6 2 6, 4, 5, 6, 8, 3 0 3, 6, 5 1 AND 3 3 6 5.

TWO OWNERS MINTO, K-R-L-L-C-Z-D-C DASH 24 DASH 2026.

AND I BELIEVE ZACH? YES, MA'AM.

THE APPLICANT HAS REQUESTED TO CONTINUE THIS ITEM TO THE MAY 12TH PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING AND THE JUNE 1ST CITY COUNCIL MEETING.

UH, SO Y'ALL MAY ACT ON THAT CONTINUANCE.

IF YOU CHOOSE TO DO SO.

THE CHAIR WILL, UM, ENTERTAIN A MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE.

I'VE GOT A COUPLE QUESTIONS ABOUT THAT.

UM, YES, SIR.

SO WHAT IS, SO IT SAYS IN HERE, UH, TO ADDRESS DISCREPANCIES AROUND OWNERSHIP AND TO EXPAND THE SCOPE.

SO WHAT MM-HMM .

CAN EITHER STAFF OR THE APPLICANT JUST KIND OF TELL US WHAT THAT'S ABOUT? YEAH, I, I CAN ADDRESS THAT BRIEFLY.

SO, UM, THE INITIAL APPLICATION, UH, INCLUDED, UH, AUTHORIZATION FROM MINTO KR, WHO IS A OWNER OF THE MAJORITY OF THE PROPERTY.

THERE IS A SMALL PIECE OF THE PROPERTY, UH, THAT IS UNDER OWNERSHIP BY THE WALTON GROUP, THAT'S THE PREVIOUS OWNER OF THE PROPERTY STILL.

UH, BY THE TIME WE HAD TO PUBLISH THIS MEETING AGENDA, WE HAD NOT RECEIVED THAT AUTHORIZATION FROM THE WALTON GROUP FOR THE PD AMENDMENT.

SO IT'S A PROCEDURAL ITEM.

UH, WE HAVE SINCE, UH, RECEIVED THAT.

UH, SO WE WILL BE ABLE TO CONSIDER THE REQUEST AT, AT THE NEXT, UH, MEETING THAT THEY'VE REQUESTED TO BE CONTINUED TO THE, UH, EXPANDED SCOPE THAT TOUCHES ON SOME, UH, ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS THAT ARE RELATED TO MOVING THE WELCOME CENTER.

MOVING THE WELCOME CENTER, UH, FROM A PORTION OF PROPERTY CLOSER TO I 35, FARTHER INTO THE SITE WAS THE PURPOSE, THE ORIGINAL PURPOSE OF THE PD AMENDMENT, UH, THAT ENDED UP REQUIRING SOME REVISIONS TO A NUMBER OF EXHIBITS IN THE PD, AGAIN FOR TECHNICAL ITEMS TO ADDRESS, UH, IMPACTS ON SCREENING, FOR EXAMPLE.

AND, UH, THE PARKS AND OPEN SPACE PLAN, FOR EXAMPLE, THAT ARE ASSOCIATED WITH MOVING THE WELCOME CENTER.

WE HAVE, UH, ALSO RECEIVED UPDATES TO EACH OF THOSE EXHIBITS,

[00:20:01]

UH, SINCE THIS, UH, AGENDA WAS PUBLISHED.

SO IT'S STILL JUST REVOLVING AROUND THE WELCOME CENTER.

IT'S JUST, THAT'S ESSENTIALLY WHAT THIS ITEM IS FOR.

CORRECT.

HASN'T GONE BEYOND THAT.

OKAY, COOL.

A MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE.

THE CHAIR WILL ENTERTAIN

[10. Consider recommendation of ZDC-24-2026]

I MOVE TO CONTINUE ZDC 2024 DASH 2026 PLAN DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT.

REQUEST FOR ORDINANCE 37 0 4 TO THE MAY 12TH, 2026 P AND Z COMMISSION MEETING IN THE JUNE 1ST, 2026 COUNCIL MEETING.

SECOND.

WE HAVE A MOTION AND A SECOND.

ALL IN FAVOR? RAISE YOUR RIGHT HAND PLEASE.

NUMBER 11, PUBLIC HEARING ON A REQUEST BY WILLIAM DAHLSTROM JACKSON WALKER, LLLP TO AMEND THE ADOPTED WAXAHATCHEE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN SOLELY TO AMEND THE THOROUGHFARE PLAN FOR THE KEMP RANCH PROPERTY.

NEXT IS ITEM

[11. Public Hearing on a request by William Dahlstrom, Jackson Walker LLP, to amend the adopted Waxahachie Comprehensive Plan, solely to amend the Thoroughfare Plan for the Kemp Ranch property.]

ZACH.

ITEM 11, AS YOU MENTIONED, IS A REQUEST FOR A THOROUGHFARE PLAN AMENDMENT.

THIS IS TECHNICALLY AN AMENDMENT TO THE WAXAHATCHEE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.

UH, AND THIS THOROUGHFARE PLAN AMENDMENT IS RELATED JUST TO THE KEMP RANCH PROPERTY.

UM, SO IF Y'ALL REMEMBER WHEN THIS PD CAME THROUGH TO YOU SEVERAL MONTHS AGO, UH, THEY INCLUDED A, UH, THOROUGHFARE EXHIBIT.

I'M GONNA SCROLL DOWN, SKIP AHEAD A LITTLE BIT TO THAT EXHIBIT NOW, JUST FOR THIS DISCUSSION.

UH, THIS EXHIBIT INCLUDED A NUMBER OF THOROUGH AFFAIRS THAT WERE PROPOSED TO SERVE THE PROPERTY.

UH, STAFF REVIEWED THE PROPOSAL AT THAT TIME WITH THE PLAN DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION AND DID DETERMINE THAT THE PROPOSAL WAS, UH, APPROPRIATE AND ADEQUATE TO SERVE THE PROPERTY.

UH, HOWEVER, UH, DESPITE THAT IT WAS NOT, UH, COMPLIANT 100% WITH THE EXISTING WAXAHATCHEE THOROUGHFARE PLAN.

UH, SO OUR REGULATIONS DO REQUIRE THAT, UH, ANY DEVELOPMENT OF THIS PROPERTY AND ANY PROPERTY IN TOWN, UH, IS COMPLIANT WITH A THOROUGHFARE PLAN AND PROVIDES, UH, APPROPRIATE DEDICATION AS REQUIRED TO THE PLAN AT THE TIME OF DEVELOPMENT.

SO, IN AN EFFORT TO MAKE SURE THAT DEVELOPMENT OF THIS PROPERTY IS CONSISTENT WITH WHAT'S BEEN MOST RECENTLY APPROVED, THEY ARE REQUIRED TO COME THROUGH AND UPDATE THE THOROUGHFARE PLAN.

SO THERE'S THREE KEY UPDATES THAT ARE PART OF THIS, UH, UPDATE.

UH, ITEM ONE IS REALIGNING THE MAJOR EAST WEST, UH, THOROUGHFARE.

THAT'S THIS 120 FOOT MAJOR ARTERIAL, UH, TO ALIGN WITH, UH, THE PROPOSAL FROM THE PD.

SO IT IS, UH, ENDING AND BEGINNING AT THE SAME POINT, BROOKSIDE ROAD AND LO ELM ROAD.

HERE.

THIS ALIGNMENT IS JUST SHIFTING ON THE INTERIOR OF THE PROPERTY, HOW IT TRAVERSES THE PROPERTY, UH, TO MAKE SURE IT MATCHES THEIR DEVELOPMENT PLANS.

THE WIDTH OF THE THOROUGHFARE IS NOT CHANGING HERE.

UH, IT IS JUST THE PATH THROUGH THE PROPERTY THAT IS CHANGING.

UH, FINALLY THERE ARE ON THE EXISTING THOROUGHFARE PLAN, I'M GONNA SWITCH TO THAT BRIEFLY, A NUMBER OF SMALLER 80 FOOT THOROUGHFARES.

IT'S A BIT HARD TO SEE ON THE SCREEN, BUT ON MY CURSOR, THOSE ARE GONNA BE REPRESENTED BY THE BLUE LINES HERE.

UH, SO THESE ARE THOROUGHFARE PLANS THAT THROUGH THE, UH, PLAN DEVELOPMENT PROCESS WERE IDENTIFIED AS ROADWAYS THAT DIDN'T TRULY NEED TO BE 80 FEET WIDE.

THOSE ARE FOUR LANE STREETS.

UH, SO THOSE THOROUGHFARE, UH, THOROUGH AFFAIRS HAVE BEEN REMOVED AS PART OF THIS REQUEST EXCEPT FOR ONE PORTION, UH, HERE ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE PROPERTY THAT CONNECTS FM 8 75 TO THE FUTURE SCHOOL SITES.

AND, UH, SPECIALTY PARK THAT ARE PROPOSED IS PART OF THE DEVELOPMENT.

SO THE THOROUGHFARE PLAN IS STILL NEEDED HERE.

LONE ELM ROAD, WHICH IS THE FINAL THOROUGHFARE YOU SEE ON THIS EXHIBIT, IS REMAINING UNCHANGED.

AS PART OF THIS AMENDMENT REQUEST, I'M AVAILABLE FOR ANY QUESTIONS YOU MIGHT HAVE ABOUT THIS REQUEST, BUT STAFF IS RECOMMENDING APPROVAL, UH, BECAUSE THIS IS SOMETHING WE'VE EVALUATED AS BEING APPROPRIATE TO SERVE, UH, THE AREA AND, AND DOES WARRANT UPDATING THE THOROUGHFARE PLAN.

UH, THE APPLICANT IS HERE AS WELL TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS YOU MAY HAVE FOR THEM.

ZACH.

UH, COMMISSION IS, ARE THERE ANY QUESTIONS FOR STAFF? HEARING NONE, UH, IS THE APPLICANT HERE, COULD YOU STATE YOUR NAME AND YOUR ADDRESS FOR RECORD, PLEASE? SURE.

COME ON UP AND STATE YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS FOR RECORD, PLEASE.

BRIAN KALE FROM MINTO COMMUNITIES 89.

39 STEEL FIELD ROAD, PANAMA CITY BEACH, FLORIDA.

UM, I THINK ZACH COVERED IT PRETTY WELL THAT I CAN ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS IF YOU'D LIKE.

ANY QUESTIONS.

THANK YOU SO MUCH.

SURE.

THIS IS A PUBLIC HEARING AND WE RECEIVED ONE, UH, CARD FOR SPEAKING DURING THIS ITEM ON OUR AGENDA.

AND THAT'S MS. KAT.

MRS. KATHY CAEL, IF YOU WOULD

[00:25:01]

HI Y'ALL.

KATHY CAEL.

IT'S 4 0 5 BROOKSIDE ROAD, WAXAHATCHEE, TEXAS 7 5 1 6 7.

YOU ALL KNOW THAT I'M VEHEMENTLY OPPOSED TO THIS NOW, THEN JUST COME TO SEE RIGHT HERE.

THEY'VE ALREADY CUT THE END OF OUR ROAD OFF.

WE HAVE NO EXIT EXCEPT CROSSING THEIR HIGHWAY, WHICH HAS TWO OR 3000 PEOPLE COMING ACROSS IT.

THERE'S WHAT, 11 HOUSES ON BROOKSIDE.

WE HAVE BEEN THERE OVER 30 YEARS.

THEY SHOULD TAKE US INTO CONSIDERATION BEFORE THEY FIGURE THIS RIGHT HERE.

THEIR POCKETBOOK.

THEY HAVE NOT CONSIDERED OR TALK TO ANY OF US ABOUT ANYTHING THAT'S GONNA AFFECT OUR HOUSES ON THAT ROAD.

NOTHING.

MY HOUSE IS DIRECTLY IN FRONT OF WHERE THAT ROAD IS SUPPOSED TO BE.

THEY'RE CUTTING IT OFF.

NOT ONLY THAT, THERE IS A WATERCOURSE IN FRONT OF MY HOUSE THAT GOES TO THAT POND AND THEY HAVE THE ROAD, THIS SIDE OF THE POND, WHICH IS GONNA CUT OFF THE POND AND THE WATERCOURSE.

NOW WHAT ARE YOU GONNA PLAN ON DOING ABOUT THAT? THAT IF MY HOUSE FLOODS, GUESS WHO I HAVE TO COME AFTER.

NOT THEM.

I HAVE TO COME AFTER THE CITY.

IF MY HOUSE HAS WATER TOUCHES THE FRONT PORCH OR MY BIG TREES IN THE FRONT YARD OR DROWNED BECAUSE, AND THEN FALL OVER, WHAT AM I SUPPOSED TO DO? I HAVE BEEN THERE MORE THAN 30 YEARS.

EVERYBODY ELSE ON THAT STREET HAS TWO AND THEY SOLD THE THREE HOUSES AT THE END OF THE STREET.

MR. KELLY DID, SO THAT THEIR ROAD WOULD GO RIGHT THROUGH THERE.

THAT'S NOT EVEN 200 FEET FROM MY HOUSE.

THAT'S NOT APPROPRIATE TO HAVE ALL THAT TRAFFIC AND STUFF.

AND THEN HOW, WE HAVE NO IDEA HOW WE'RE SUPPOSED TO GET INTO THIS ROAD.

OH, YOU'LL HAVE A LEFT TURN LANE OVER HOW MANY LANES TO GET TO OUR THINGS.

WHAT ABOUT GETTING OUT, WHAT ABOUT I HAVE TO GET OUT AND GO TO SCHOOL EARLY IN THE MORNING AND YOU'VE GOT 10,000 CARS COMING THERE.

HOW AM I SUPPOSED TO GET OUT THERE AS WELL AS EVERYBODY ELSE ON THAT STREET AS WELL AS EVERYBODY ELSE THERE? HOW ARE WE SUPPOSED TO GET OUT SAFELY THAT WAY? THERE'S NOT ANYTHING THERE.

THERE IS NOT ANY, AGAIN, THEY HAVE NOT TALKED TO ANY OF US.

THEY HAVE NOT SAID ANYTHING ABOUT WHAT THEY WANT TO DO.

SHOW US WHERE IT'S GONNA BE.

ANYTHING LIKE THAT.

THIS IS THE FIRST THAT WE'VE SEEN OF THAT.

AND THAT'S INAPPROPRIATE TO TAKE ADVANTAGE OF THOSE OF US ON BROOKSIDE.

NOW I'M 75, I'M STILL WORKING.

THERE'S LADIES NEXT TO ME THAT'S OLDER THAN I AM.

THERE'S OTHER PEOPLE DOWN THE STREET.

ARE WE GONNA TAKE ADVANTAGE OF THEIR OLD, YOU KNOW, BEING OLD AND NOT, NOT ABLE TO DRIVE AS WELL AS EVERYBODY ELSE? WHAT ABOUT THE KIDS AND THE OTHER FAMILIES ON THAT STREET? IT'S NOT THERE.

YOU HAVE SAY, YEAH, LET'S, LET'S CUT OFF THE END OF BROOKSIDE.

THOSE PEOPLE DON'T, DON'T AMOUNT TO ANYTHING.

WE DON'T AMOUNT TO DO TO DOODLY SQUAT WITH THIS GROUP.

NOTHING.

THEY HAVE NOT SHOWN US.

THEY HAVE NOT SET OUT THERE NOTHING OUT THERE TO SHOW US WHAT THEY WANNA DO WITH THIS.

WE SEE THIS RIGHT HERE.

I CAN SHOW YOU EXACTLY WHERE MY HOUSE IS ON THAT EXACTLY ON THAT MAP RIGHT THERE.

THERE'S NOTHING THERE.

IT'S GONNA DIRECTLY AFFECT MY HOUSE AND THE HOUSE NEXT TO ME.

MS. OWENS, WHO'S OLDER THAN ME, THE HOUSE NEXT TO THAT.

AND THEN MS. THE CALL'S HOUSE.

IT'S GONNA, IT'S GONNA AFFECT EVERYBODY ON THAT STREET.

AND THEN THE PEOPLE RIGHT NEXT DOOR TO ME THAT BOUGHT THE, UH, MS. ALOS OLD HOUSE HAD NO IDEA THIS WAS EVEN COMING IN.

MS. CAEL, I WANNA CHECK WITH STAFF TO MAKE SURE THAT PROPER NOTIFICATION WENT OUT ON, ON THIS MATTER.

RIGHT, I GOT IT.

YEAH, I GOT NOW AS FAR AS THIS GOES, YEAH.

BUT AGAIN, THIS RIGHT HERE, AGAIN, JUST ANY OF THIS STUFF, AND I THINK, I THINK YOU HAVE SOME VALID POINTS.

NOT MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS.

MS. CASE AND I, I, SO I I CAN ANSWER BY THE NOTIFICATION.

SO FOR THE THOROUGHFARE PLAN AMENDMENT, IT DOES NOT REQUIRE NOTIFICATIONS TO GO TO PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN TURN FEE.

WE ARE REQUIRED TO POST IN THE NEWSPAPER ACCORDING TO STATE LAW.

UM, ANY KIND OF AMENDMENT TO THE PD DOES REQUIRE PROPERTY OWNER NOTIFICATION, WHICH WE DID SEND OUT.

SO FOR THE PREVIOUS ITEM, THE PROPERTY NOTIFICATION WAS ALSO SENT OUT.

SO YEAH, SHE, YEAH, SHE, SHE AGREES THAT SHE RECEIVED NOTIFICATION ABOUT IT.

I JUST WANTED TO MAKE SURE FROM MY OWN, YOU .

YES, DEFINITELY.

BUT I, I WOULD, I WOULD JUST LIKE TO SHARE WITH YOU FROM THE COMMISSION'S PERSPECTIVE MM-HMM .

IT, WE HAVE TO STICK TO THE LETTER OF THE LAW.

AND IF THEY'RE MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS, THEY'RE

[00:30:01]

I'M SORRY TO INTERRUPT YOU.

THEY HAVE NOT OKAY.

NOT CHECKED WITH, WITH THE WATER BOARD YET.

THEY HAVE NOT.

THERE IS A WATERCOURSE IN FRONT OF MY HOUSE THAT GOES DOWN, IT GOES UNDER THE DRIVE THE ROAD RIGHT THERE.

IT FLOWS INTO THAT POND.

THEY HAVE NOT YET CHANGED THAT.

YOU CANNOT CHANGE THAT ACCORDING TO THE STATE OF TEXAS.

SO IF THAT'S IN FACT THE CASE, THE THE INFORMATION THAT WE HAVE IS WHAT WE HAVE TO GO BY.

I WOULD STRONGLY RECOMMEND THAT WHEN THIS COMES BEFORE COUNSEL, THAT YOU SHARE WITH THEM THESE SAME CONCERNS.

ABSOLUTELY.

I MEAN, THEY ALREADY KNOW ME TOO.

, THIS, THIS ITEM THAT WE'RE DISCUSSING THOUGH, IS JUST A PLAN.

IT'S NOT FULLY BAKED READY FOR CONSTRUCTION PLANS FOR THIS ROAD.

SO THAT'S HOW WE SUPPOSED TO KNOW WHEN IT'S GONNA START IN, WHENEVER THEY START BRINGING THE BIG TRUCKS AND STUFF OUT THERE AND START TAKING IT OUT, THAT ALL COMES LATER.

THIS IS JUST A CONCEPTUAL PLAN FOR THE CITY'S, UH, THOROUGHFARE PLAN.

IT'S NOT, AND I CAN ALSO SHED SOME LIGHT ON THAT AS WELL.

UM, IT SAID IT SPECIFICALLY STATES BROOKSIDE ROAD ON HERE.

IT DOES, YEAH.

RIGHT HERE.

THE AERIAL ROADWAY BROOKSIDE ROAD, WHICH IS THE BRIDGE.

THAT'S CORRECT.

BUT OUR STREET NAME IS BROOKSIDE ROAD AND THEY'RE CUTTING OFF, THEY'RE CUTTING OFF OUR ACCESS.

TRENTON, WHAT WERE YOU GONNA SHARE WITH US? YEAH, COMMISSIONER SIMPSON'S.

100% CORRECT IN THAT, IN THE IN DEVELOPMENT PROCESS, UM, THIS PROJECT IS STILL REQUIRED TO MEET ALL STATE, ALL ALL LOCAL, STATE AND FEDERAL REGULATIONS, IF ANY POINT THEY CAN'T MEET ANY OF THE STATE OR FEDERAL REGULATIONS, UM, THAT THEY'D HAVE TO ADDRESS IT AT THAT POINT.

SO, UM, YEAH, COMMISSIONER SIMPSON AND HIS ANALYSIS IS ABSOLUTELY CORRECT.

WELL, WE APPRECIATE YOU FOR SHARING YOUR CONCERNS WITH US.

WELL, YES, ABSOLUTELY.

I'M JUST CONCERNED ABOUT NOT JUST ME, BUT EVERYBODY ON OUR STREET.

I WAS GONNA ASK STAFF A QUESTION.

HOW, HOW WIDE IS, IS THAT ROAD? I MEAN, HOW MANY LANES IS THAT? SIX.

THE, UH, SIX PROPOSED 120 FOOT ARTERIAL IS THE WIDTH OF THAT ROADWAY.

UH, THIS, WHAT YOU'RE SEEING ON SCREEN HERE IS THE FULL BUILD OUT CONDITION.

IT GOES UP TO SIX LANES.

INITIAL DEVELOPMENT WILL NOT BE ALL SIX LANES.

SO THEY, THEY WILL START OUT SMALLER THAN THAT.

AND AS THE DEVELOPMENT REACHES, UH, BUILD OUT, UH, AT, AT THAT TIME, THEY WILL GET UP TO THE MAXIMUM SIX LANES IF IT'S WARRANTED, UH, BY TRAFFIC PATTERNS AT THAT TIME.

SO BY WHAT I JUST HEARD, THEN WE GET TO HAVE THEM WORK ON THE ROAD TWICE INSTEAD OF ONE TIME.

AND THEN THEY WANT SIX LANES FOR US TO HAVE NEGOTIATED.

THAT'S REALLY, YOU KNOW, AND THAT MEANS COMING ACROSS IT, TRYING TO GET IN, HAVING TO COME THROUGH THERE.

AND THE WAY I UNDERSTAND, THE LAST TIME I SAW ANYTHING, THE WAY THAT THE ROAD COMES INTO THE HOUSE DIRECTLY SHINES INTO MY FRONT YARD, INTO MY FRONT WINDOW.

DO I WANNA HAVE, DO YOU WANNA HAVE CARS DRIVING ALL HOURS THE DAY AND NIGHT COMING IN AND SHINING RIGHT INTO YOUR FRONT, FRONT ROOM? I DON'T.

OH, WE'LL BUILD A FENCE.

NO, THAT'S NOT GONNA HELP YOU.

NOT ON THE ROAD.

IT WON'T WILL.

WE APPRECIATE YOU SHARING YOUR CONCERNS.

THE PD THAT WE VOTED AGAINST MM-HMM .

I APPRECIATE Y'ALL AND THANK Y'ALL VERY MUCH FOR WHAT YOU DO.

I REALLY APPRECIATE Y'ALL VERY MUCH, ESPECIALLY LISTENING TO THE OLD LADY HERE TALK ABOUT IT.

SO THANK YOU.

WE WILL NOW CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND THE CHAIR WILL

[12. Consider recommendation to amend the adopted Waxahachie Comprehensive Plan, solely to amend the Thoroughfare Plan for the Kemp Ranch property]

ENTERTAIN A MOTION.

I WOULD LIKE TO MOVE TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THE PROPOSED THOROUGHFARE THOROUGHFARE PLAN AMENDMENT FOR THE CAMP RANCH PROPERTY WITH AND STAFF.

TELL ME IF I CAN DO THIS WITH THE CAVEAT THAT ANY EXISTING RESIDENTIAL STREETS SHOULD HAVE A PLACE TO TURN RIGHT OUT OF THEIR NEIGHBORHOOD OR SOME SORT OF TRAFFIC MECHANISM SO THAT THEY ARE NOT TRYING TO TURN LEFT OVER THREE LANES OF TRAFFIC.

SO I WOULD RECOMMEND, UM, NOT TO MAKE THAT MOTION.

THAT'S, UH, FOR THE THOROUGHFARE PLAN THAT'S KIND OUTSIDE THE CONFINES OF THE THOROUGHFARE PLAN.

THAT'D BE MORE OF A PD AMENDMENT.

UM, THIS IS JUST FOR THE WIDTH AND THE ALIGNMENT OF THE PRO OF THE ROADS.

BUT THEN WHEN DOES THAT, LIKE DOES THAT COME BACK TO US? SO THAT WAS ACTUALLY DURING, WHEN THE PD WAS APPROVED.

UH, A LOT OF THAT WAS, UH, DICTATED DURING THE PD, UH, PROCESS UHHUH.

UM, ALSO AS THEY CONTINUE ON DEVELOPMENT, AS ZACH HAD PREVIOUSLY MENTIONED, THE ROADS WILL AT THE BEGINNING OF THE PROJECT NOT BE AT FULL CAPACITY.

AS THE PROJECT CONTINUES TO BE DEVELOPED, THOSE ROADS WILL BE EXPANDED.

UM, AND THOSE TIAS THAT ARE REQUIRED TO AS DEVELOPMENT OCCURS, THAT'S WHAT TRIGGERS THOSE RIGHT LEFT LANES IF LIGHTS ARE GONNA BE REQUIRED LATER ON IN THE DEVELOPMENT, UM, BUT AT THIS POINT IN TIME, UH, WOULD NOT BE APPROPRIATE FOR THAT KIND OF MOTION.

[00:35:01]

COUNCIL APPROVED IN THIS ROOM, THE COUNCIL APPROVED, RIGHT? YES.

THAT HAD ALL KINDS OF VAGUE AND INCONSISTENT THINGS IN IT.

THAT WAS WHEN WE HAD A CHANCE TO, TO SAY THAT THE EXISTING RESIDENTS SHOULDN'T HAVE CONCERNS WITH TRYING TO TURN OUT OF THEIR NEIGHBORHOODS.

UH, THAT'S CORRECT.

UM, AND, AND ONCE AGAIN, A LOT OF THAT IS ALSO TRIGGERED LATER ON THROUGH THE TIAS.

UM, EVEN WITH OTHER DEVELOPMENTS THROUGHOUT THE CITY, UM, THOSE KIND OF DECISIONS AREN'T MADE THROUGH A ZONING PROCESS.

THEY'RE MADE THROUGH TIAS, UH, GIVEN THROUGH OUR ENGINEER, OUR CITY ENGINEERS AND THEIR ENGINEERS.

AND CERTAIN ITEMS THAT TRIGGER THOSE POINTS REQUIRE LEFT OR RIGHT HAND TURN LANES.

AND FOR THE AUDIENCE THAT ISN'T AWARE WITH THE ACRONYM TI ISS TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS, SORRY, I NERDED OUT.

I'M GLAD YOU GLAD YOU EXPLAINED IT TO, BUT WE, WE DID OUR PART AND WE WERE, WE'RE, WE'RE A RECOMMENDING BOARD.

I'M SORRY.

IT'S ONCE AND DONE.

MS. CAOL.

I JUST WANNA WAIT, WHEN IS TIA WHEN CAN YOU ADDRESS THEM? WE DO HAVE ONE OF OUR CITY ENGINEERS IN THE AUDIENCE THAT CAN ADDRESS THAT LITTLE MORE.

BUT TIAS ARE GENERALLY DONE BY THE AMOUNT OF TRAFFIC IS BEING GENERATED, THE PHASE, AND THIS PD AND THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT.

THERE ARE CERTAIN THINGS THAT TRIGGER OUR TIA REQUIREMENTS.

STATE YOUR NAME FOR US PLEASE.

GOOD EVENING.

MY NAME'S TRACE HILTON.

I AM THE CITY ENGINEER FOR THE CITY OF WAXAHATCHEE AS A PART OF THE DEVELOPMENT PROCESS.

UM, THE TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS THAT YOU REFERRED TO WILL, UH, LOOK AT SPECIFIC AREAS THAT WHERE ROADWAYS, UM, COME INTO INTERSECTIONS AND, UM, DRIVE APPROACHES THAT HAVE, UM, A LARGE AMOUNT OF TRAFFIC THAT JOIN INTO THE ARTERIAL OR THE ROADWAYS THAT YOU SEE HERE.

THE TIA WILL, UM, ANALYZE THE, UM, THE TRAFFIC GENERATION FROM THOSE ADJACENT DEVELOPMENTS THAT COME ALONG.

AND AS THOSE, UH, DEVELOPMENTS COME IN, THEY WILL BE REQUIRED TO INSTALL TURN LANES, DESAL LANES, ACCELERATION LANES, UM, IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE RULES, UM, OF, UH, THE TRAFFIC GENERATION.

SO THANK YOU SO MUCH.

SO DID THEY TAKE INTO CONSIDERATION THE HARDSHIP FOR PEOPLE WHO LIVE THERE? AS FAR AS, I MEAN, I WOULDN'T WANNA LIVE SOMEWHERE WHERE I HAD TO TURN LEFT OUT OF ACROSS THREE LANES OF TRAFFIC.

RIGHT.

TRAFFIC TO GET OUT OF MY NEIGHBORHOOD.

I MEAN, THAT'S CRAZY, RIGHT? SO I THINK, UM, A DETAILED LOOK DURING THE CONSTRUCTION PLAN REVIEW PROCESS WOULD, UH, ALLOW US TO LOOK AT ANY KIND OF CONSIDERATIONS.

WE CAN CERTAINLY TAKE A DETAILED LOOK AT ANY, NOT ONLY, UM, HER CONCERNS WITH HER DRIVEWAY, BUT ANY, UM, ANY OTHER RESIDENTIAL USES, UM, THAT ARE ALONG THOSE, ALONG THE MAJOR THOROUGHFARE.

AND WE'LL ALSO LOOK AT THE ALIGNMENT A LITTLE BIT CLOSER HERE IS A VERY BROAD SWATH, AND IT'S NOT DETAILED.

AS WE GET INTO THE CONSTRUCTION PLANS, UM, WE'LL, WE'LL BE ABLE TO SHIFT THAT ALIGNMENT A LITTLE BIT, UM, TO MAKE IT, UH, MORE APPROPRIATE AS THEY, AND A LITTLE BIT MORE DISTANCE AWAY FROM HOMES SO THAT THEY HAVE ROOM TO SO ACCOMMODATE, UM, HOW THEY APPROACH THE, THE ROADWAY THAT'S ADJACENT TO THEM.

SO AS WE GO THROUGH THE PROCESS, I, I THINK WE HAVE THE OPPORTUNITY TO DO THE BEST WE CAN.

WE WILL DO OUR BEST AS WE GO THROUGH, UH, PLAN REVIEW TO MAKE IT, UM, UH, ACCOMMODATE AS MUCH AS WE CAN.

YEAH.

THANK YOU YOU SO MUCH, TRACY.

I STILL CAN'T SHIFT IT AWAY FROM MY HOUSE BECAUSE THEY'LL TAKE OUT THE TIME.

CAN'T DO THAT.

THE STATE OF TEXAS OWNS THAT WATER.

YES, MA'AM.

UNDERSTOOD.

UM, I DON'T KNOW IF, IF IT WAS HEARD, UH, ON, ON THE RECORD OR ANYTHING, BUT, UM, AS WE GET CLOSER, TAKING A LOOK AT THE ALIGNMENT AND THE POSITION OF THE, UH, WATERS OF THE US, UM, WE ARE LIMITED ON WHERE WE CAN CONNECT AND THE PHYSICAL LIMITATIONS OF WHERE THE, UH, ROADWAYS CAN CONNECT.

BUT WE ARE GIVEN THE RESTRAINTS, UM, OF WHAT'S, WHAT'S OUT THERE RIGHT NOW.

SO, UM,

[00:40:01]

SURE.

THANK YOU SO MUCH, TRACY.

WELL, THE, UH, PUBLIC HEARING IS CLOSED AND THE CHAIR WILL ENTERTAIN A MOTION MOVE TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THE PROPOSED FAIR PLAN AMENDMENT FOR THE KEMP RANCH PROPERTY.

SECOND, WE HAVE MOTION AND A SECOND.

ALL IN FAVOR? RAISE YOUR RIGHT HAND PLEASE.